SHAREHOLDER ACTION ALERT: Law Firm Schall Reminds Investors of Class Action Against AppHarvest, Inc. and Encourages Investors with Losses Over $ 100,000 to Contact Firm

LOS ANGELES–(COMMERCIAL THREAD) –Schall Law Firm, a national shareholder rights litigation firm, reminds investors of a class action lawsuit against AppHarvest, Inc. (“AppHarvest” or “the Company”) (NASDAQ: APPH) for violations of §§10 (b) and 20 (a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission.

Investors who purchased the Company’s securities between May 17, 2021 and August 10, 2021 inclusive (the “Recourse Period”), are invited to contact the company before November 23, 2021.

If you are a shareholder who has suffered a loss, Click here to participate.

We also encourage you to contact Brian Schall of the Schall Law Firm, 2049 Century Park East, Suite 2460, Los Angeles, CA 90067, at 310-301-3335, to discuss your rights free of charge. You can also reach us through the firm’s website at, or by email at [email protected]

The class, in this case, has not yet been certified, and until certification occurs, you are not represented by legal counsel. If you choose to do nothing, you can remain an absent member of the group.

According to the complaint, the company made false and misleading statements to the market. AppHarvest has not sufficiently trained its extended workforce. The Company could not consistently produce Grade 1 tomatoes at its facilities. These problems were likely to have an impact on the financial performance of the Company. Based on these facts, the Company’s public statements were false and misleading throughout the Class Period. When the market learned the truth about AppHarvest, investors suffered damage.

Join the case to recoup your losses.

The Schall law firm represents investors around the world and specializes in securities class actions and shareholder rights litigation.

This press release may be considered an attorney’s advertisement in certain jurisdictions under applicable law and rules of professional conduct.

About the author